Join the NASDAQ Community today and get free, instant access to portfolios, stock ratings, real-time alerts, and more! Join Today.
Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence – Consortiumnews. In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U. S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year. Editor’s Note: This VIPS Memo included two mistaken dates. Neither affected the Memo’s main conclusion; i. July 5, 2. 01. 6 intrusion into DNC emails that was blamed on Russia could not have been a hack – by Russia or anyone else. The portions of the Memo affected by the mistaken dates have been corrected. A short explanation of the corrections: -(1) June 1.
- Biss keys, biss key, biss keys 2017,biss key 2017,latest biss key, biss keys astra, biss keys hotbird, biss nilesat, biss keys sattelite.
- The app is certainly a relic, from a time when the casual computer user couldn’t crack open Photoshop or Skitch or Pixelmator or thousands of web apps.
1 Hit Hack In Cf Username
VIPS memo erroneously stated) was the day Crowdstrike said malware had been found on the DNC server and claimed there was evidence the malware was injected by Russians. (On the following day – the 1. Guccifer 2. 0” claimed responsibility for the “hack” and claimed to be a Wiki. Leaks source.)- (2) Although the VIPS Memo indicated, correctly, that on June 1. Guccifer 2. 0” … posts a document that the forensics show was synthetically tainted with ‘Russian fingerprints,’” other language in the Memo was mistaken in indicating that evidence of such tainting was also found in the “Guccifer 2. July 5. MEMORANDUM FOR: The President. FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?
Executive Summary.Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2. Volvo S40 Boost Gauge Install Wrx . DNC computer. After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.July 5, 2. 01. 6 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device.Then- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (right) talks with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, with John Brennan and other national security aides present.Photo credit: Office of Director of National Intelligence)Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.
S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here]. Independent analyst Skip Folden, who retired after 2. IBM Program Manager for Information Technology, US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co- author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber- Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings. The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.
1 Hit Hack In Cf User And Pass
FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2. NOTE: There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We focus specifically on the July 5, 2. Guccifer 2. 0 “hack” of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2. Wiki. Leaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any evidence that Wiki. Leaks received DNC data from the Russians [see here and here].
Addressing this point at his last press conference (January 1. Intelligence Community Assessment of January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to Wiki. Leaks.”Obama’s admission came as no surprise to us.
It has long been clear to us that the reason the U. S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a transfer of a “Russian hack” to Wiki.
Leaks is because there was no such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical experience of our ex- NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a year that the DNC data reached Wiki. Leaks via a copy/leak by a DNC insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data on July 5, 2.
From the information available, we conclude that the same inside- DNC, copy/leak process was used at two different times, by two different entities, for two distinctly different purposes: -(1) an inside leak to Wiki. Leaks before Julian Assange announced on June 1. DNC documents and planned to publish them (which he did on July 2. DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and- (2) a separate leak on July 5, 2.
Wiki. Leaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a “Russian hack.”* * *Mr. President: This is our first VIPS Memorandum for you, but we have a history of letting U. S. Presidents know when we think our former intelligence colleagues have gotten something important wrong, and why.
For example, our first such memorandum, a same- day commentary for President George W. Bush on Colin Powell’s U. N. speech on February 5, 2. U. S. attack Iraq and “justify” the war on intelligence that we retired intelligence officers could readily see as fraudulent and driven by a war agenda. Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the United Nations on Feb.
Iraq had WMD, but the evidence proved bogus. The January 6 “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand- picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda- driven category.
It is largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2. DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to Wiki. Leaks. The recent forensic findings mentioned above have put a huge dent in that assessment and cast serious doubt on the underpinnings of the extraordinarily successful campaign to blame the Russian government for hacking. The pundits and politicians who have led the charge against Russian “meddling” in the U.
S. election can be expected to try to cast doubt on the forensic findings, if they ever do bubble up into the mainstream media. But the technical limitations of today’s Internet are widely understood. We are prepared to answer any substantive challenges on their merits. You may wish to ask CIA Director Mike Pompeo what he knows about this. Our own lengthy intelligence community experience suggests that it is possible that neither former CIA Director John Brennan, nor the cyber- warriors who worked for him, have been completely candid with their new director regarding how this all went down.
Copied, Not Hacked. As indicated above, the independent forensic work just completed focused on data copied (not hacked) by a shadowy persona named “Guccifer 2.
The forensics reflect what seems to have been a desperate effort to “blame the Russians” for publishing highly embarrassing DNC emails three days before the Democratic convention last July. Since the content of the DNC emails reeked of pro- Clinton bias, her campaign saw an overriding need to divert attention from content to provenance – as in, who “hacked” those DNC emails? The campaign was enthusiastically supported by compliant “mainstream” media; they are still on a roll.“The Russians” were the ideal culprit. And, after Wiki. Leaks editor Julian Assange announced on June 1. We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” her campaign had more than a month before the convention to insert its own “forensic facts” and prime the media pump to put the blame on “Russian meddling.” Mrs. Clinton’s PR chief Jennifer Palmieri has explained how she used golf carts to make the rounds at the convention. She wrote that her “mission was to get the press to focus on something even we found difficult to process: the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.”Independent cyber- investigators have now completed the kind of forensic work that the intelligence assessment did not do. Oddly, the “hand- picked” intelligence analysts contented themselves with “assessing” this and “assessing” that. In contrast, the investigators dug deep and came up with verifiable evidence from metadata found in the record of the alleged Russian hack.